Below are the categories of transitional forms claimed by evolutionists. Transitional forms are categorized by what they are supposedly evolving toward; for instance, the category “Humans” is the category of fossils that supposedly represent ape-like creatures turning into humans.
Often evolutionists jump to conclusions because a missing link would be very valuable, and so they ignore the evidence. 1
General objections to transitional forms:
Sometimes, evolutionists are deceptive. For instance, once they drew a series of transitional forms with each fossil about the same size, when in fact the fossils were very different in size. 2
Sarfati, J. D., & Matthews, M. (1999). Refuting Evolution. Green Forest, AR: Master Books.
- Sarfati, 1999, p. 62: Quoting “University of Kansas paleontologist Larry Martin,” “You have to put this into perspective. To the people who wrote the paper, the chiken would be a feathered dinosaur.” ↩
- Sarfati, 1999, p. 72: “On page 18 [of Teaching about Evolution] there is a nice picture of an alleged transitional series between land mammals and whales (drawn at roughly the same size without telling readers that some of the creatures were hugely different in size — see the section about Basilosaurus in this chapter).” ↩